• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Check out our best resources to get an AQMD permit

Envera Consulting

California Air Quality Compliance

  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
    • Air Permits
    • Annual Emission Reports
    • SCAQMD Basics
    • SCAQMD Rules
    • Environmental Compliance
    • EPA Regulations
    • Envera News
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Annual Emission Report (AER) Resources
    • What Is the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)?
    • SCAQMD Air Quality Permitting Resources
    • A Short Guide to the SCAQMD’s RECLAIM Program
    • Web Resources
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Environmental Compliance / The Difference Between Actual and Maximum-Potential Air Emissions

The Difference Between Actual and Maximum-Potential Air Emissions

January 26, 2018 By Grant T. Aguinaldo

Actual versus Maximum-Potential Emissions
Actual versus Maximum-Potential Emissions
(Credit: Pugo Design Studio)

A lot of our posts have been numbers-related, in one way or another, particularly when it comes to air emissions. I’ve discussed the general formula for calculating air emissions, costs associated with SCAQMD NOVs, calculating permit-processing fees per Rule 301, and on and on.

But one topic I haven’t yet covered is the different types of emissions you might be calculating for, and this really depends on the situation. There are only two types of calculations that really matter in our environmental-compliance world: the maximum potential to emit and the average emissions from a piece of equipment.

Maximum Potential vs. Actual Emissions

The difference between the two is very important because each could have a very different numerical outcome — and thus affect your project.

But although the difference is important, it’s also rather simple. The maximum potential means just what it sounds like: the emissions that would be emitted if the machine or process were operated at 100 percent of its rated capacity, which is often found on the equipment’s nameplate. So one way to calculate maximum-potential emissions would be to take the rated capacity from the nameplate and multiply that by the maximum time that the equipment would be operated.

Many facilities operate around the clock, with little downtime, so they might calculate the emission by assuming the equipment will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. But if you’re a smaller facility, such as a family bakery, and you know that you’re only operating that equipment no more than eight hours a day, five days a week, you can use that for the calculation.

Then there’s actual emissions. In the vast majority of cases, the actual emissions are less than the maximum potential — which makes sense, because most equipment doesn’t operate around the clock at the nameplate capacity. In fact, I’d venture to say that most equipment operates between 50 and 80 percent of the nameplate.

How to Determine Which Emission Scenario to Use

When doing a rule analysis, it can be difficult to determine which rules and regulations apply without knowing the equipment’s emissions. But even before you calculate the emissions, you need to know if you’re calculating the maximum potential or the actual emissions.

Generally speaking, permitting usually requires you to calculate the maximum potential emissions. So if you’re determining applicability to the Title V program or calculating emissions for a permit application, you’ll calculate maximum potential. Example situations of when you’ll use actual emissions are when preparing an annual emission report or conducting an annual emission inventory for greenhouse gas.

That’s the difference in a nutshell. Any questions?

Related

Filed Under: Environmental Compliance Tagged With: air quality compliance, emissions inventory

Want More Environmental Compliance Tips?

Ensure you stay in compliance by getting news and updates delivered right to your inbox. Sign up for the Envera newsletter.

Sign Up

About Grant T. Aguinaldo

Grant is a principal at Envera Consulting. As the Sherlock Holmes of environmental consulting, Grant solves current-day problems using modern tools. More on Twitter or LinkedIn.

Primary Sidebar

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get weekly tips and news on California’s air quality regulations right in your inbox.

Recent Articles

  • SCAQMD Rule 1153.1, and The Emissions Shake-Up from Southern California Coffee Roasters April 29, 2024
  • What Happens If the SCAQMD Denies Your Air Permit December 7, 2018
  • A 4-Tiered Analytics Maturity Model for Environmental Compliance November 16, 2018
  • Parking Tickets, Environmental Noncompliance & the SCAQMD’s Variance Process October 5, 2018
  • Why Emissions Guarantees Are So Crucial for Permit Applications September 21, 2018

Footer

Contact Information

Envera Consulting
1107 Fair Oaks Avenue #295
South Pasadena, CA 91030
grant.aguinaldo@enveraconsulting.com
415-203-0520

Let’s Get Started on Your Project!

Let Envera Consulting help you navigate your business to compliance.
Work With Us

Search

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2014 - 2018 ENVILEARN, LLC DBA ENVERA CONSULTING ENVERABYTE IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF ENVILEARN, LLC · Log in
Privacy Policy · Terms of Service