• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to footer navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Check out our best resources to get an AQMD permit

Envera Consulting

California Air Quality Compliance

  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
    • Air Permits
    • Annual Emission Reports
    • SCAQMD Basics
    • SCAQMD Rules
    • Environmental Compliance
    • EPA Regulations
    • Envera News
  • Services
  • Resources
    • Annual Emission Report (AER) Resources
    • What Is the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)?
    • SCAQMD Air Quality Permitting Resources
    • A Short Guide to the SCAQMD’s RECLAIM Program
    • Web Resources
  • Contact
You are here: Home / SCAQMD Basics / SCAQMD Regulations vs. Permits: What’s the Difference?

SCAQMD Regulations vs. Permits: What’s the Difference?

June 30, 2017 By Grant T. Aguinaldo

The difference between regulations and permits in the AQMD
The difference between regulations and permits in the AQMD
(Credit: Pugo Design Studio)

In helping clients understand SCAQMD requirements, we at Envera have often seen folks get mixed up with permits and regulations. And we can see why — there’s a lot of overlap.

For those short on time, here’s a quick breakdown: Regulations are broad-reaching requirements that are always in effect and, therefore, must always be followed, regardless of whether a permit is required. Permits, on the other hand, are only required in certain circumstances and are generally much narrowly focused than regulations.

If you’ve got some time and need more info, here’s a deeper breakdown, as well as examples of each.

Regulations

Generally speaking, regulations cover operational and performance standards that must be followed or adhered to by facilities. These standards are quite detailed and are designed to place limitations or restrictions on how covered processes (e.g., solvent-cleaning operations) or types of equipment (e.g., commercial baking equipment) can be operated.

Regulations cover all classes of equipment, permitted and otherwise, within the SCAQMD’s jurisdiction and can also cover manufacturers of products such as solvents and paints. Requirements can include anything from monitoring and reporting to recordkeeping.

Regulations always need to be followed, regardless of whether permitting is required.

Of course, when we say “always,” there are exceptions. There are cases when a regulation does not need to be followed if permitting is not needed. For example, Rule 1147 only needs to be followed if a permit is required. A similar situation exists for Rule 1110.2, so it’s important to bone up on both of those rules to determine whether or not you need to comply.

Example: Rule 1171

Rule 1171 applies to all solvent-cleaning operations that are present at facilities within the SCAQMD. On a high level, Rule 1171 sets limits on the volatile organic compound (VOC) content of the solvents used during various cleaning activities.

So if you have a facility that uses a cleaning solvent, you need to understand and comply with Rule 1171 — even if your facility isn’t required to hold a permit for that process. For example, the solvents used for surface preparation at a medical-device operation cannot exceed a VOC limit of 800 g/L. The rule also has other requirements, such as recordkeeping.

Permits

Simply put, permits are a mechanism that consolidates all regulations that pertain to a single piece of equipment. At least, that’s what permits do in theory. (More on that in a second.) Permits aren’t necessarily stricter than regulations, but they are more specific, covering a specific piece of equipment or process at a single location.

The goal of permitting is to ensure that the permitted equipment can comply with all applicable rules and regulations. However, unlike a regulation, permits are only needed sometimes.

When we first take on a client at Envera, we start with the assumption that every piece of the client’s equipment needs a permit. Then we refer to the “trio of permit-applicability rules” — Rules 201, 219, and 222 — to see if the equipment qualifies for exemption. In many cases, it does.

But if a permit is required, it should be issued with all of the regulations with which the equipment must comply. As mentioned above, that’s what a permit is supposed to do. But sometimes a permit is not written properly, which can cause it to conflict with a regulation. Although such contradictions are not intended, it can put you in a pickle.

This is never an optimal case, since you’re required to comply with both the regulation as well as the language on the face of your permit. If such conflicting language occurs, a possible short-term solution is to comply with the most stringent regulations (although this may not always work in your favor). But the best long-term solution is to have the permit amended to change the problematic language.

For this reason, we highly recommend that, once you’ve received your permit, you thoroughly review all conditions and, if any contradictions or other errors are found, submit an appeal within the 30-day window.

Example: Permitting a Thermal Oxidizer

Let’s say you want to install and operate a 5 MMBTU/hr thermal oxidizer. Such equipment requires an SCAQMD permit, which is then issued to this specific piece of equipment at a specific location. The issued permit will also contain conditions designed to ensure compliance with all of the rules applicable to this type of equipment. This can get tricky since the SCAQMD may (accidentally) omit some rules. But even if it does, the onus is on you to be aware of all the applicable regulations your equipment must comply with — even those missing from the permit.

Part of the purpose of the Title V program was to ensure that all pertinent regulations were included on the permit, so equipment in the Title V program, more often than not, will not see issues in this area. However, it does happen quite frequently with permits for non-Title V equipment. In such situations, we highly recommend that you work with someone who knows the regulations, such as a staff member hired for this very purpose or an experienced consultant (like us).


Still have some questions about whether your equipment needs to comply with a regulation or permit conditions? Contact us and we’ll guide you through the process.

Related

Filed Under: SCAQMD Basics Tagged With: Rule 1110.2, Rule 1147, Rule 1171, Rule 201, Rule 219, Rule 222, Title V compliance, volatile organic compounds (VOC)

Want More Environmental Compliance Tips?

Ensure you stay in compliance by getting news and updates delivered right to your inbox. Sign up for the Envera newsletter.

Sign Up

About Grant T. Aguinaldo

Grant is a principal at Envera Consulting. As the Sherlock Holmes of environmental consulting, Grant solves current-day problems using modern tools. More on Twitter or LinkedIn.

Primary Sidebar

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get weekly tips and news on California’s air quality regulations right in your inbox.

Recent Articles

  • SCAQMD Rule 1153.1, and The Emissions Shake-Up from Southern California Coffee Roasters April 29, 2024
  • What Happens If the SCAQMD Denies Your Air Permit December 7, 2018
  • A 4-Tiered Analytics Maturity Model for Environmental Compliance November 16, 2018
  • Parking Tickets, Environmental Noncompliance & the SCAQMD’s Variance Process October 5, 2018
  • Why Emissions Guarantees Are So Crucial for Permit Applications September 21, 2018

Footer

Contact Information

Envera Consulting
1107 Fair Oaks Avenue #295
South Pasadena, CA 91030
grant.aguinaldo@enveraconsulting.com
415-203-0520

Let’s Get Started on Your Project!

Let Envera Consulting help you navigate your business to compliance.
Work With Us

Search

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2014 - 2018 ENVILEARN, LLC DBA ENVERA CONSULTING ENVERABYTE IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF ENVILEARN, LLC · Log in
Privacy Policy · Terms of Service